Home > Blogs > Dot Comms > Archive for February, 2012

Archive for February, 2012

 

Anti-social networking

February 15, 2012 | Written by Guest Blogger

Whilst my taste in fashion goes more to A Bathing Ape and S-Double rather than Ermenegildo Zegna I respect the way Zegna do business.

Zegna haven’t gone down the same road of online promotion that brands like Burberry have with massive efforts on their Facebook page, instead they have taken a much more pragmatic approach to building their client relationships. In this podcast with Monocle’s Tyler Brûlé, Gildo Zegna talks about reducing the amount of above the line spend that they do and increasing the number of in-store events.  The rationale this approach was interesting: as well as the usual consumer insights, Zegna shared this bit of consumer psychology:

Go and meet the customer, talk to them, even if he doesn’t buy anything he will come back next season. Because next season he will be poor not to buy, or not to enjoy.

Zegna uses in-store collated email lists to drive this very analogue networking process as part of the dialogue with the customer. Not everyone needs to do everything on Facebook; particularly if you want long-lasting, high-touch, narrowcast relationships. In Facebook parlance, its not about likes or the followers; but gaining TRUE friends for the brand.

Comments (0) | Permalink

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

 

What Reporters Want

February 8, 2012 | Written by admin

When I was a journalist, a common refrain among my colleagues was that most PR firms “just don’t get it.” Their gripe? What reporters want is pretty straightforward: a good story angle, a quotable source and accurate information–ideally on demand and in plain English. So why don’t more PR many practitioners, they complain, provide it?

It’s been a little over a year since I left a career in magazine journalism (I know, that’s something of an oxymoron given the dire state of magazine advertising these days) for one in public relations, and I’ve gained a new appreciation for why it is not always possible to deliver (maybe the client is reluctant or too busy to talk to the press, for instance, or maybe the client really shouldn’t be talking to the press!)

But there are a few things that the media always want that we can and should provide. For starters, a jargon-free press release or pitch that provides context and forward-spin. Even the smallest bit of news can generate coverage if it can be seen as part of a larger trend and the broader future significance is explained. The more you can frame the issue, provide supporting evidence and additional material, the more likely a reporter will respond.

Of course, providing a quotable source isn’t easy. But just because your client communicates in geek speak, there’s no excuse for you to do the same. Think of the KISS principle in journalism: Keep it short and simple. If you can’t explain something briefly and clearly, don’t bother. Given, many reporters receive 100 or more emails each day, your email needs to be clear brief and interesting—and that includes the subject line. Keep it short, to the point and catchy, “press release” just doesn’t cut it. Remember brevity is key for the body of your message, too. And think twice before attaching any big files which can be cumbersome and irritating. If you can’t get your point across clearly and quickly in the body of an email, think twice about sending it.

That leaves the last bit—providing accurate information. Just like us, reporters work on tight deadlines and often make seemingly endless and last minute demands for information. Trust me, it’s not done to irritate you (although it might seem like that after the umpteenth request). But don’t be tempted to bluff answers or conversely ignore a reporter’s call if you can’t get the information they need. Instead, admit you don’t know and find someone who does–fast. Sound like common sense? It is and it’s not meant to be condescending. But given how often PR practitioners ignore some of these basics it bears repeating.

Comments (0) | Permalink

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

 

What selling Kirby cleaners taught me about digital marketing

February 3, 2012 | Written by Guest Blogger

After finishing secondary school I sold Kirby vacuum cleaners for about six weeks in Liverpool. It wasn’t something that I planned to do for any length of time and it was particularly financially rewarding. So why did I end up lugging an aluminum industrial grade vacuum cleaner cleaning system around Liverpool for the best part of a month during the summer?

This was before work experience became mandatory as part of secondary school education and I was in the classic trap of not being able to get a job because I didn’t have the relevant experience.

So what did it teach me?

  • People didn’t buy the machine, they bought you. A lot of the people weren’t that impressed with the system at first when you take it out of the packaging and the demonstration showed that it did what you expected. The customers primarily bought into you as a person and the goods was just an artifact in many instances. This is the reason by careful forging of a brands community online is so important
  • People trust other people like them. Once you had cracked one house on a street, it was much easier to sell to other people on the road. It was like you had been ‘pre-vetted’. Reputation by trust and association drives sales
  • People want to be the same as people like them. Despite our quest for individuality, we like to have at least the same level of lifestyle as our peers. Keeping up with the Jones’s did a lot of the selling for me. It’s also part of the reason why Facebook will have at least some success with its social advertising platform

Comments (0) | Permalink

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

Subscribe

 

 

About the Bloggers

 

Categories

 

 

Recent Comments

 

Tags

 

 

Recent Post

 

 

RF Blogs Network

 

 

Blogroll

 

 

Archive