Home > Blogs > Dot Comms > Order, order – can John Bercow restore it?

Dot Comms

prev prev    main   next  next

Order, order – can John Bercow restore it?

June 23, 2009 | Written by William Heald

 Like the Conservative Party Leadership contests of 2001 and 2005; the contest for Speaker this week (Monday 22nd of June) suddenly gave the media, and to a certain extent the public, a hook for their interest - for an intense period.

John Bercow won through amidst a group of the old, Richard Shepherd and Sir Patrick Cormack, the experienced, Sir Michael Lord and Sir Alan Haselhurst and the high-profile Ann Widdecombe and Margaret Beckett. Apart from Parmjit Dhanda, Mr Bercow was the only character who could convincingly propound reformist principles without being attributed to the old traditions of the past.

In this way his victory does mark a break - Bercow is young(ish), energetic and full of life - a welcome change from Speaker Martin. He undoubtedly has support from the Left, in fact his campaign manager was Labour MP for Reading West, Martin Salter. Also he has never been someone to toe the line. In the 1980s he was thought to be too right-wing for the Conservative party and then in the 2000s he switched to a new left-wing style (prompted by marriage to his left-wing wife) breaking rank to vote with his new found social conscience on issues such as gay rights.

So it is difficult to say there is any particular group he must appease - he is a lone figure, independent, as the Speaker must be.

But can he actually do anything?

Betty Boothroyd, in my personal opinion a great Speaker, was interviewed mid-way through the contest by the BBC and whilst explaining how important the job was and the sort of character it needed she was asked what tenable powers the Speaker had to change the House of Commons:

Of course the Speaker has authority, but not power (she said) just the power to persuade, it was not the Speaker’s job to interfere - he must speak on behalf of the House and abide by its decisions.

So when it comes down to the facts of this contest we find an empty husk. The election of Speaker Bercow sends a message to the public that the House of Commons is willing to appoint someone with reformist intentions, but it does nothing more. He has no remit except to make suggestions to party leaders and the Prime Minister; it is still the House of Commons, who finally decide.

All those who have been treating Speaker Bercow’s election as the rise of a new independent leader of the House, on a par with party leaders, have been deceived by an over eager press excited with a good contest.

Speaker Bercow can by all means encourage, nudge, assuage and egg on his colleagues towards reform - but he can do nothing more. He is just a Speaker of the House of Commons encharged with carrying out the business of the House, but not making the business or affecting its outcome. On the outside this seems like a big break - but in reality MPs must change the House of Commons themselves not just the Speaker.

Tags: , , , , ,

 

Digg It | Reddit | De.lic.ious

prev prev    main   next  next

Post Your Comment 

Subscribe

 

 

About the Bloggers

 

Categories

 

 

Recent Comments

 

Tags

 

 

Recent Post

 

 

RF Blogs Network

 

 

Blogroll

 

 

Archive